1. He’s dead serious about real freedoms. Other politicians just talk “freedom” with no action or further explanation.
2. He actually sticks to his principles. He’s not a flip-flopper, not lying all the time to be popular for the moment like most politicians. Step back and take a good look at the other GOP candidates. Do they have a lifelong history of being genuinely pro-freedom and pro-constitution? Do you really think that just because they talk more freedom and constitution now (because it’s more popular) that they would stand by these principles in office? I want to vote for the one who stood by his principles when it wasn’t popular at all and was hated and called crazy by most. Ron Paul says and stands for what he believes, regardless of the negative fallout. What do you want, truth, or more BS?
4. He believes in questioning US foreign policy. If you don’t believe in at least questioning US foreign policy, you don’t care much about the lives and limbs of our soldiers, let alone innocent victims in the conquered territories.
I don’t know if I would agree with everything Ron Paul would do as quickly as he would have it done, but it’s worth a very serious, even aggressive debate, don’t you think? If congress and the congress with the President are getting along well, they’re not getting much done!
5. The media is ignoring him, despite his increasing success in debates and polls. If the mainstream media and political establishments hate him, he must be doing something right!
Time is short, but our course of action should be clear. Resistance to illegal and unconstitutional usurpation of our rights is required. Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said we did nothing.
I love this. This radio host was giving Mitt Romney a chance – but Romney was laughing off the issues that matter to real Americans. The host gets increasingly angry as Romney basically mocks him, Ron Paul and the need to aggressive, real change to regain some real freedoms and lower taxes. Romney seems to be making excuses to leave the interview. After he does so, the host goes on a very justified rant, calling Mitt Romney an “asshole”, saying he gave Romney a chance, but now wants to support Ron Paul instead.
Romney laughs off serious progress toward real freedom, as he plans to continue the neo-con soft-socialist agenda and young-American-slaughtering war machine.
This is the must-see interview video of Hermain Cain by MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnel. O’Donnel’s juvenile, desperate attacks reveal him to be the ass that he is, making Cain look all the better. This liberal is so desperate to bring down a black conservative, he takes any cheap shot he can.
Among other things, O’Donnel criticizes Cain for not participating in the civil rights protests of the 60′s and not going to Vietnam, though he supported the war effort through a Navy civil servant job. He was even told by the Navy that he was more valuable to the nation in that position than a grunt in Vietnam.
I looked up the Wikipedia article on Lawrence O’Donnel. Though, not a complete bio, to be sure, I see no mention of military service nor participation in civil rights protests by O’Donnel, himself.
Herman Cain vs. Lawrence O’Donnel Interview, Part 1
Herman Cain vs. Lawrence O’Donnel Interview, Part 2
How likely is it? Unfortunately, not very, though it would be the best thing that happened to America since it’s founding.
America, vote for who you will, but remember, we told you so! Don’t come complaining to we libertarian types when you vote yourself into further, irreversible tyranny and hellish collapse!
What if… the United States of America, with the usual game between variants of Democrat and the Republican neo-cons, bring this nation to total collapse within 50 years? Weakened enough, even our military cannot be sustained with a collapsed economy and an oppressed and disillusioned population. We very well may be conquered indirectly. We may become effectively enslaved, as a colony of China, as we try to pay interest on our debts to them and it seeks more control in return. We may be conquered directly or indirectly by the ever-growing global political powers of Europe.
Whatever the type of fall, what if we had one last chance, one short window of opportunity to turn things around. Voting Democrat or neo-con is like asking “Which poison do you want, the fast-acting one (Democrat) or the slow-acting one (the compromising, freedom-yielding neo-con)?”. Call me crazy, but I wouldn’t want any poison at all.
What if… our last and only chance was to reinvent this nation simply as it was intended by the founding fathers?
What if… we bring freedom back?
What if… voting in a strong libertarian direction was the last and only hope for this nation?
What if… a libertarian running as a Republican was the realistic only way to get on the presidential ballot?
What if… Ron Paul is the only real choice to save this nation?
The current two-party system, with their two flavors of big government tyranny and dysfunction will both continue to destroy this nation in their own ways. How can you ever trust a neo-con type? They smile, look all “presidential” and say enough of the right things in their campaign, then abandon principles of liberty for political gain when in office.
Who among the candidates has been astonishingly consistent?
Who has been less of a politician and more of a principled man?
Who shows a very strong record for a genuine and unapologetic fight for freedom?
Ron Paul is our only choice. Think about it long enough and I think you’ll agree.
A new television ad points out that Ron Paul boldly supported the election of Ronald Reagan, considered radical and “unelectable” (sound familiar?) at the time, while Rick Perry eventually supported a presidential bid by Al Gore to defeat Reagan! Now, who do you trust? The one who has been more consistent for 40+ years or another neo-con?
1. He’s dead serious about real freedoms. Other politicians just talk “freedom” with no action or further explanation.
Time is short, but our course of action should be clear. Resistance to illegal and unconstitutional usurpation of our rights is required. Each of us must choose which course of action we should take: education, conventional political action, or even peaceful civil disobedience to bring about necessary changes. But let it not be said we did nothing.
