<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Freedom-Lover Nation &#187; Less Regulations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freedomlovernation.com/category/freedom/less-regulations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freedomlovernation.com</link>
	<description>Standing for restoration of REAL freedoms, the pursuit of happiness and prosperity in America!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 05:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Many Democrats agree to all ban business profits and more</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2012/09/many-democrats-agree-to-all-ban-business-profits-etc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2012/09/many-democrats-agree-to-all-ban-business-profits-etc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 05:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Less Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEO pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excessive regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter Schiff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomlovernation.com/?p=1359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter Schiff goes &#8220;undercover&#8221; at the Democratic National Convention to see just how leftist and stupid Democrats can be. Some agree to ban business profits, limit CEO pay and think that the government should control exactly who you hire or fire. Technically, Peter is not undercover, it&#8217;s just that these people do not choose to<a href="http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2012/09/many-democrats-agree-to-all-ban-business-profits-etc/"> Read more...</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Schiff goes &#8220;undercover&#8221; at the Democratic National Convention to see just how leftist and stupid Democrats can be. Some agree to ban business profits, limit CEO pay and think that the government should control exactly who you hire or fire. Technically, Peter is not <em>undercover</em>, it&#8217;s just that these people do not choose to watch true alternative media like Peter Schiff and his economic and political commentary, and so they don&#8217;t recognize him as the furthest thing from  Democrat you can be (a libertarian), economically-speaking. </p>
<div class="vid1" style="margin-top:15px;padding-top:20px;"><iframe width="450" height="253" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/07fTsF5BiSM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="true"></iframe></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2012/09/many-democrats-agree-to-all-ban-business-profits-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s liberal policy that makes the rich richer and the poor poorer!</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2012/02/liberal-policy-makes-rich-richer-poor-poorer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2012/02/liberal-policy-makes-rich-richer-poor-poorer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Excessive Government Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Less Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Tyranny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal deception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberal failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wealth gap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomlovernation.com/?p=949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liberal/big government policy actually makes the richer richer and the poor poorer &#8211; the opposite of what they claim. I have eventually come to the conclusion that the government has in-effect stolen potential wealth from the poor and middle class and made the rich richer with it. Not directly, but by excessive regulations &#8211; which<a href="http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2012/02/liberal-policy-makes-rich-richer-poor-poorer/"> Read more...</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PUK1894page380rector_poor.jpg"><img border="0" style="float:right;margin-left:5px;" src="http://www.freedomlovernation.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/gap_between_rich_and_poor.jpg" alt="Gap between the rich and poor" /></a>Liberal/big government policy actually makes the richer richer and the poor poorer &#8211; the opposite of what they claim. </p>
<p>I have eventually come to the conclusion that the government has <em>in-effect</em> stolen potential wealth from the poor and middle class and made the rich richer with it. Not directly, but by <a href="http://www.freedomlovernation.com/excessive-government-regulations-the-invisible-evil/">excessive regulations</a> &#8211; which in effect give the rich advantage and ability to develop their businesses, real estate ventures, properties and lives where the poorer cannot. The rich can deal with excessive regulations &#8211; the poor cannot. But the *right* thing to do is to not steal that money back (two wrongs don&#8217;t make a right), but immediately abolish unnecessary regulations so the poor can better catch up.</p>
<p>So, there is this sinister game going on where the liberal elite convince the poor to vote Democrat, claiming it will help them. But then the liberals cry for more excessive regulation on everything (more so than the <a href="http://www.freedomlovernation.com/the-neo-con/">neo-con</a>), thereby giving more advantage to the already-rich, making the rich richer and the poor poorer. The neo-con is also guilty for doing this, only in a less aggressive manner.</p>
<p>Give a damn for the poor? Vote Libertarian (or a <em>very, very</em> libertarian Republican like <a href="http://www.freedomlovernation.com/heroes-of-freedom/ron-paul/">Ron Paul</a>) and give them the damn dignity of <em>freely</em> doing well for themselves on their own.</p>
<p>BusinessInsider.com: <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/the-negative-effects-of-income-inequality-on-society-2011-11#">This Is How Income Inequality Destroys Societies</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2012/02/liberal-policy-makes-rich-richer-poor-poorer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If libertarian ideals were implemented, this economy would take off like a rocket!</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2011/09/if-libertarian-ideals-were-implemented-this-economy-would-take-off-like-a-rocket/</link>
		<comments>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2011/09/if-libertarian-ideals-were-implemented-this-economy-would-take-off-like-a-rocket/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 01:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Excessive Government Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Less Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lower Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Big Government Take-over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomlovernation.com/?p=762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If libertarian ideals were fully implemented, this economy would take off like a rocket! Libertarians, as I use the term, includes those in the actual Libertarian Party, such as Gary Johnson and others who stand by libertarian principles, such as Ron Paul. That libertarian reforms would greatly boost the economy is obvious to those with<a href="http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2011/09/if-libertarian-ideals-were-implemented-this-economy-would-take-off-like-a-rocket/"> Read more...</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If libertarian ideals were fully implemented, this economy would take off like a rocket! Libertarians, as I use the term, includes those in the actual Libertarian Party, such as Gary Johnson and others who stand by libertarian principles, such as Ron Paul.</p>
<p>That libertarian reforms would greatly boost the economy is obvious to those with enough intelligence to understand how the economy <em>really</em> works, but not so obvious to those who can&#8217;t get it and are brainwashed with liberal or neo-con dogma. <em>More</em> government molestation of business and personal activity is <em>not</em> the answer. <em>Less</em> government <em>is</em>!</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Libertarians would eliminate all unnecessary regulations on business</strong>, thereby allowing business to develop and grow at a much faster pace. For those who can&#8217;t &#8220;put two and two together&#8221;, that means many more jobs, more raises, promotions, more stable careers and pensions.</li>
<li><strong>Libertarians would eliminate all unnecessary regulations on personal activity</strong>, thereby stimulating demand and a new motivation for life for many people. This translates to more demand for more products and services, creating more jobs and improving the standard of living (as each person would pursue according to their own style &#8211; not the right or left style conformity society tries to force us into).</li>
<li><strong>Libertarians would dramatically lower taxes, tax complexity and tax tyranny for business</strong>, which would be more money companies could use to hire more employees, give raises or even invest in other businesses. We use the term &#8220;tax tyranny&#8221; to mean excessive bullying by the IRS and state tax agencies that slows business activity and ultimately results in fewer jobs and lower wages.</li>
<li><strong>Libertarians would dramatically lower taxes, tax complexity and tax tyranny for individuals</strong>, thereby giving people more money to improve their own lives as they see fit, and doubtless this money would better stimulate the economy than how the government would spend (waste) it.</li>
<li><strong>Libertarians would have ZERO tolerance for government waste</strong> and that means many, many things! No more bail-outs, loans for certain companies, no more government blowing money on alternative energies, <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/05/08/government-funds-study-gay-sex-argentina-bars/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%253A+foxnews%252Fpolitics+%28FOXNews.com+-+Politics%29" target="_blank">studies of risky behavior of homosexuals in Argentine bars</a>, no more <a href="http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/your_tax_dollars_hard_at_work_medicare_pays_for_penis_pumps/" target="_blank">paying some old man to get an erection</a>, no more corporate welfare, no more farmer welfare and perhaps even converting individual welfare to private charity (churches, organizations, etc.).</li>
<li><strong>Libertarians would greatly reduce government bureaucracy</strong>, passing the savings to taxpayers. This would be a significant economic boost on it&#8217;s own!</li>
<li><strong>Libertarians would relax property regulations</strong>, creating a sustained, permanent boost in the real estate industry, translating to more jobs, more freedom and more potential for the poor to afford a home and have some dignity.</li>
<li><strong>Libertarians would demand sound money</strong>, audit the Federal Reserve and ensure we weren&#8217;t effectively printing extra money, like some extremely irresponsible third world country gaining temporary advantage for the government while crushing the people financially.</li>
<li><strong>Libertarians would resurrect what it really means to be free</strong>, what it really means to be American, invigorating the nation with a new zeal for life and economic success.</li>
</ul>
<p>And for those who don&#8217;t realize, Ron Paul is a libertarian who runs as a Republican as a political strategy, and because the Republican platform is a closer match to the freedoms that matter most (but obviously not a great match at all, nowadays). All freedoms matter, but if the economy collapses (entirely) from lack of economic freedom, nothing else will matter. In addition to assaults on basic freedoms with such hastily written legislation as the Patriot Act, mainstream Republicans have not even done a very good job of standing for the economic freedoms they are supposed too! Consider voting for someone <em>no less libertarian</em> than Ron Paul going forward. Your vote may not count toward a win, but it <em>will</em> count as a statement &#8211; a statement that will be harder to ignore as the Republican establishment (and Democrats) hemorrhage more and more votes! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2011/09/if-libertarian-ideals-were-implemented-this-economy-would-take-off-like-a-rocket/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA threatens to outlaw green use of coal ash</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2010/10/epa-threatens-to-outlaw-green-use-of-coal-ash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2010/10/epa-threatens-to-outlaw-green-use-of-coal-ash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 23:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Excessive Government Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Less Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Tyranny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to Engage in Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Liberal Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomlovernation.com/?p=373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love it when left-leaning CNN does something that is actually critical of the same (leftist, liberal, big government) policies that they support! What contradictory idiots! Anyway, this video describes how the EPA is threatening to outlaw use of coal ash, which includes the manufacture of gypsum drywall (sheet rock). I suppose the EPA would<a href="http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2010/10/epa-threatens-to-outlaw-green-use-of-coal-ash/"> Read more...</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love it when left-leaning CNN does something that is actually critical of the same (leftist, liberal, big government) policies that they support! What contradictory idiots! Anyway, this video describes how the EPA is threatening to outlaw use of coal ash, which includes the manufacture of gypsum drywall (sheet rock). I suppose the EPA would rather see this material in landfills?</p>
<p>The materials used, in this case doesn&#8217;t contain heavy metals or other toxins in any significant levels. Why is the federal government so stupid that people, companies, county and state governments have to spend massive amounts of money and energy to open the government&#8217;s eyes to more rational regulation? Are we on the same side or what? </p>
<p>I guess our federal government (and many states and local jurisdictions) just can&#8217;t destroy our economy fast enough. Are they that evil or just that stupid? The former would make for a better movie, but the latter is more realistic.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;max-width:425px;width:425px;">
<object width="416" height="374" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="ep"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&#038;videoId=us/2010/10/08/am.costello.coal.ash.epa.cnn" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&#038;videoId=us/2010/10/08/am.costello.coal.ash.epa.cnn" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416 wmode="transparent" height="374"></embed></object></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2010/10/epa-threatens-to-outlaw-green-use-of-coal-ash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama: my cap &amp; trade plan would make electricity rates skyrocket</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2010/09/obama-electricity-rates-skyrocket-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2010/09/obama-electricity-rates-skyrocket-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 20:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business and Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Less Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Tyranny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Liberal Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomlovernation.com/?p=184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just in case anyone hasn&#8217;t seen this, in this interview, Obama states &#8220;Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket&#8221;. This interview was before his active presidential campaign and I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s been this honest, open and direct since before his campaign. I have to hand it to<a href="http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2010/09/obama-electricity-rates-skyrocket-video/"> Read more...</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case anyone hasn&#8217;t seen this, in this interview, Obama states &#8220;Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket&#8221;. This interview was before his active presidential campaign and I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s been this honest, open and direct since before his campaign. I have to hand it to him for being honest, open and direct here.</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HlTxGHn4sH4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HlTxGHn4sH4?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>If it were only electricity rates, that would be bad enough, but the liberal agenda would skyrocket the costs of everything, all while killing jobs, economic growth and opportunity. If a video like this doesn&#8217;t make it crystal-clear that Obama is a far-left liberal, I don&#8217;t know what will.</p>
<p>The liberal agenda will achieve it&#8217;s goals at all costs, if it takes freezing, bankrupting, starving, killing and imprisoning those who will not comply with their way. Think this is conspiracy talk? Just do more research, think about it harder, do a little extrapolation and see where it leads. Americans a hundred years ago would be horrified to see the tax rates and big government domination, manipulation and oppression that exists now. Can you imagine what future, in 50 or 100 years, that we would now consider horrifying, but would slowly accept like dumb sheep along the way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2010/09/obama-electricity-rates-skyrocket-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is this REALLY what you want? Annual $700+ fine for being poor!!!</title>
		<link>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2009/12/is-this-really-what-you-want-annual-700-fine-for-being-poor-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2009/12/is-this-really-what-you-want-annual-700-fine-for-being-poor-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Excessive Government Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Less Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RINOs & Neo-Cons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freedomlovernation.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excerpts from article: It&#8217;s not official yet&#8211;but it&#8217;s getting awfully close. With the Senate finally passing an $871 billion healthcare reform bill, there&#8217;s just one major step left before the most sweeping healthcare legislation in at least 45 years becomes law. Senate negotiators will next meet with their counterparts in the House&#8211;which passed its own<a href="http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2009/12/is-this-really-what-you-want-annual-700-fine-for-being-poor-2/"> Read more...</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excerpts from article:</p>
<div style="margin: 20px; background-color: #dddddd;">
<p>It&#8217;s not official yet&#8211;but it&#8217;s getting awfully close. With the Senate finally passing an $871 billion healthcare reform bill, there&#8217;s just one major step left before the most sweeping healthcare legislation in at least 45 years becomes law. Senate negotiators will next meet with their counterparts in the House&#8211;which passed its own $894 billion bill in November&#8211;to work out the differences and try to forge one bill that Congress can present to President Obama.</p>
<p>Required coverage (the &#8220;individual mandate&#8221;). American citizens and legal residents would be required to have health insurance, or pay a fine. For an individual, the fine would be $750 per year or 2 percent of household income, whichever is greater; for a family, the maximum fine would be $2,250 per year or 2 percent of household income. The fines would go into effect gradually, starting in 2014. The House bill is similar, with exemptions for certain low-income people.</p>
</div>
<p>Am I the last freedom-lover in this nation?!?!?!?!? What&#8217;s wrong with you people?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even know where to begin in describing the irrationality of this.</p>
<p>Merry Freakin&#8217; Christmas.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnews/20091224/ts_usnews/howthesenatebillwouldchangehealthcare" target="blank">How the Senate Bill Would Change Healthcare</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.freedomlovernation.com/2009/12/is-this-really-what-you-want-annual-700-fine-for-being-poor-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
